there are 350 tables in database.in each hour 60 records appended to each
table.there is a unclustered index on each table.
but database size grows abnomarly (fragmentation) .i exported and imported
it then the size was normal .but again after inserting records
the size of grows abnormally.
this db is used in real time system so time is impossibe.when i used
clustered index the insertion action was very slow.so i used unclustred
index.
i used dbreindex , defrag whitout any advantage for defragmanting.
thanks of all.
--
Message posted via http://www.sqlmonster.comsepideh iranpour via SQLMonster.com wrote:
> there are 350 tables in database.in each hour 60 records appended to
> each table.there is a unclustered index on each table.
> but database size grows abnomarly (fragmentation) .i exported and
> imported it then the size was normal .but again after inserting
> records
> the size of grows abnormally.
> this db is used in real time system so time is impossibe.when i used
> clustered index the insertion action was very slow.so i used
> unclustred index.
>
> i used dbreindex , defrag whitout any advantage for defragmanting.
> thanks of all.
Is it possible the database is just auto-growing to accommodate the
newly inserted data? i don't think fragmentation would itself be the
cause of abnormal growth. Is it just the data file size that's growing
and not really the underlying data in the file(s)?
--
David Gugick
Imceda Software
www.imceda.com
No comments:
Post a Comment